Ecology : Think National - Act Local!

One of the fastest moving growth-economies is 'ecology' which todays makes billions of pounds for the select elite who promote this, as well as the 'scientists' whose ideas are taken up. It also gives a lot of the lesser people something to do in the untold spare time they seem to have. The problem is that much of what has been 'scientifically proven' has never been proven, and never will. Since these scientific theories are the basis of modern 'ecology' and the millions ploughed into it the whole thing gets more and more of a farce as it progresses. We need to look at this in a sane way so that at some future time a National Government can set things right and plough the millions of pounds wasted on 'ecology' into worthwhile projects that can help the people to live a better and more healthy life.

 

Global Warming -

 

It is noticeable that the term 'Global Warming' is rather going out of fashion nowadays, perhaps because since 1998 scientists have found that the earth is cooling rather than warming. This has meant a change of terms for the masses, hence the more often used 'Climate Change'. You really would think that people would notice what is going on and see through the rubbish that was spouted about 'Global Warming'/'Climate Change' and that the warming and cooling of the planet has more to do with the Sun and the Earth's magnetic fields than with man-made 'pollution'. We can use a very simple scientific formula that tells us the origins of the 'Global Warming' idea -

 

ag x gw = bs

 

 

This formula can be translated thus -

 

 

Al Gore x Global Warming = Bull-Shit

 

 

"The warnings about global warming have been extremely clear for a long time. We are facing a global climate crisis.... The entire North Polar ice cap is disappearing before our very eyes. It's been the size of the continental United States for the last 3 million years and now 40 per cent is gone and the rest of it is going.... Sixty-eight per cent of Americans now believe that human activity is responsible for global warming. Sixty-nine per cent believe that the Earth is heating up in a significant way... What is missing is a sense of urgency....The good news is, we have everything we need now to respond to the challenge of global warming. We have all the technologies we need, more are being developed.... But we should not wait, we cannot wait, we must not wait."

Al Gore



 

 

The idea that 'Global Warming' or 'Climate Change' (take your pick) is man-made implies naturally that mankind must do something about it, and this leads to the inevitable conclusion that to stave off a catastrophe we need a World Government that can solve a 'global problem'. It is not hard today to recognise the growing 'global problems' that have suddenly cropped up, and inevitably the solutions have to be 'global' and thus warrant this World Government being put into place.

 

"The emerging 'environmentalization' of our civilization and the need for vigorous action in the interest of the entire global community will inevitably have multiple political consequences. Perhaps the most important of them will be a gradual change in the status of the United Nations. Inevitably, it must assume some aspects of a world government."

Mikhail Gorbachev

 

Note the word 'environmentalization' which is the new method used to scare people into believing that only through the creation of a World Government can we avert a catastrophe that could destroy the planet. Here we see the attack upon our freedom coming from different directions - the USA and Russia, the two great powers of the world. But there are of course, offshoots to this process, and that is the making of billions out of the whole thing, not only though paying the people who are working with this rubbish, but also in the taxation raised to help bring down the 'carbon footprint' (don't they come out with some bull....!)

 

"Creating an ideology pegged to carbon dioxide is a dangerous nonsense. The present alarm on climate change is an instrument of social control, a pretext for major businesses and political battle. It became an ideology."

Delgado Domingos  (environmental scientist).

 

 

Genetically Modified Foodstuffs (GM) -

 

This is the area where man (or certain sections) is interfering in nature in a very dangerous way. We may ask ourselves why these people would take such risks in tampering with our food supply.

 

"Population reduction and genetically engineered crops were clearly part of a broad strategy: the drastic reduction of the world's population. It was in fact a sophisticated form of what the Pentagon termed biological warfare, promulgated under the name of "solving the world hunger problem."

F. William Engdahl - "Seeds of Destruction"

Food for thought there I would think. This would need far more investigation in order to prove that there is a grain of truth in this statement.

"The folks at the Rockefeller Foundation were deadly serious about wanting to solve the world hunger problem through the worldwide proliferation of GMO seeds and crops... They were out to limit population by going after the human reproductive process itself."

F. William Engdahl - "Seeds of Destruction".

The above sentence seems to help to solve this riddle, since there may be some truth in the use of GM foods to limit human reproduction. But I see a problem here, since in order to do so they would need to aim this at the inert masses in a way that would not affect the 'Elite' who control the reins. The problem is that widespread GM crops would surely spread all over the place and thus eventually affect all food - and themselves too. I know these people are rather crazed in their ideas but this would not make sense at all.

 

Here I have used caution in believing another 'conspiracy theory' since I think that this needs looking into further, but needless to say the production of GM foods is absolute madness in any case and has to be stopped before a real disaster happens. This is all that needs to be said on the subject. It would be far easier to see the attack on the human reproductive process being done through the water-supplies, alternative sources being available to the Global Elite. Since GM foods are a recent thing there would not be the test results that most likely have been already obtained for chemical use in water-supplies.

 

We need answers to the real ecological problems but to tackle them we need to put aside the modern 'Green' solutions based upon globalism and get down to local and national solutions that are workable. When we dismiss the lies of the Old Order and get down to tackling the problems then sanity will once more prevail on this planet. This means the rejection of the 'Global Ecology' designed to scare the masses into accepting a World Government and the switch to a regional and national ecology - Tribal Ecology if you like.

 

Solar Energy -

 

Solar panels are springing up on many new houses, and also being used on older houses too, but the drive to get this energy source up and going has been done mainly because of the shortage of energy due to the crackpot ideas of the Red-Green Alliance that have cut off other natural supplies. It is thus feasible to suggest that this will only be done on a limited scale so that individual households can put energy back into the national grid and thus stave off future power-cuts. This is certainly not the way to look to the future, and again will end in problems.

 

The answer is individual solar-power where each household can produce its own energy which would be free and the only cost would be the installation, maintenance and renewal when it wears out. A system geared to make profit from energy would hardly be able to support such a scheme - too much freedom would be entailed to do that! A change to this would also mean that a national grid system with all its power-lines and ugly pylons would  not be necessary any more. (A lot of people would be put out of their jobs but I am sure that we could switch their employment to making and installing the solar panels, and maintaining and renewing them too. If this did not fit all the workers into the new plan there is plenty more to do in building up this country through growing and producing vital goods here once more.)

 

There is yet another point here in that although I am not an expert on the subject of electricity, using solar-power would perhaps mean that we can switch away from the 240 volt system to using 12v or 24v systems for lighting - much safer I would have thought. I would think that this would be quite feasible since car-lighting has vastly improved over the past few years and the use of LEDs gives much better lighting.This switch would mean that the unnecessary 'gadgets' of today would have to be ditched in order to lessen the wasteful use of electricity, but again we are looking to a time when better humans will be produced, humans with a bit more common sense and responsibility for the welfare of the whole. Also, with the ditching of the wasteful 'gadgets' people would get far more natural exercise again and become fitter and healthier - no need to pay 'gym' costs and the ever-growing cost of 'exercise machines' that make a good profit for the Global Elite. Getting rid of the 'gadgets' would do little harm to the work-force since these are almost all made abroad (China mainly) and would not affect us in the area of manufacture. I will not concern myself with the 'wholesaler' since this area of business would be redundant, and is only there for profiteering without working for it. English Citizens in this area would have plenty more to do in getting this nation straight once more - better roads, better health service, and better cultural facilities, growing food and the production of essential goods - all would need building and running. Not only this, since the switch would be from mass-consumerism and mass-production to quality and craftsmanship things would not be in such a rush and the lessening of stress and anxiety would be phenomenal.

 

Wind-Energy -

 

The same applies to wind-energy as it does to solar-energy, for this would need to be done at an individual and family level where energy would be produced free of charge once the cost of installation and maintenance has been met. This would not need massive wind-turbines that blight the landscape (and are rather inefficient too) for it would entail small wind-turbines built in the garden (every Englishman should - and will - have a piece of land to work for themselves). This type of power can easily supply lighting to a house, and here a switch to 12v or 24v could be made, and the use of battery power (charged by the wind-turbine) helps to solve the storage problem. This system works for every car and would thus be viable for a household with the use of a larger turbine. We can see the use of solar-wind power on some road-signs so this would not be hard to put into practice for the individual household.

 

I don't think we would have any problems with wind-power since here in England we have such strong winds over the darker period of the year, and even through the spring and summer too sometimes. Although long-term planning is needed there is a case to look at short-term changes in the weather in order to use the situation efficiently.

 

Wind-power today is invariably linked to the production of electricity, but we should remember that in the past the use of windmills was to turn the mill to produce bread, and this would be something to consider again for more widespread use. Technology has moved on and is very much more sophisticated, but no doubt the new technology could be harnessed on old methods of production - and much more efficiently I would think. There is a case here to revive the old methods but harness them in making smaller and more efficient means to grind corn into flour for local distribution.

 

Water-Power -

 

This is something that cannot be done on a large scale since to use any form of water-power needs running water which is not there for everyone. To revert to water-power such as that used in the old mills should be a consideration. Since technology has come a long way since the old and clumsy mills these would be far more efficient and they would be used - once again - at a local level serving local needs, which means that their size need not be enormous.

 

It should also be pointed out that in a Heathen English Society the large towns and cities would be abandoned in favour of small towns, villages and hamlets - especially with the population having decreased to a manageable size in this country. (We shall look into this later in this post.) This means that buildings would be sited near to the most convenient sources of energy, as they were in the past before the alienation of our land took place through the various non Anglo-Saxon regimes that have ruled here for over a thousand years. Brooks, streams and rivers would again become sources of renewable energy as they were in the past.

 

I stated earlier that you would need a running water-source for water-power, but this is not strictly true because any form of water that is moved onto a kind of water-wheel and is recycled around all of the time would run the water-wheel efficiently. So really this can be done on the smallest scale for family use - all that is needed is water, and with the weather here in England there is no shortage of that.

 

Water Supplies -

 

Water comes down from the clouds free of charge (in endless supply here in England) and is gathered in reservoirs, where it is cleaned, treated and filled with chemicals (that we know nothing of) and then is sold back to the people. But this does not end there, for the waste water that is produced is then taken away again - for which we are charged again. If we were to switch to a saner system where the individual household (with emergency supplies collected at a local level) collected their own supply of water which was then pumped around the house where it was needed then we would need no water-pipes running throughout the land, and no major water-pipe repairs and vast leaks that cost thousands if not millions of pounds. Since this is a fresh-water supply there would be no need for it to be taken away; a much better method would be to cut out the harmful chemicals in soaps and washing-up liquids, filter the used water and run it into storage tanks which can be re-used for toilet flushing or watering the garden.

 

Since we are talking about smaller Folk-Communities here there is no need for large reservoirs, only smaller areas where water could be stored up for use in an emergency. Dealing with smaller areas means that temporary pipes could be set up to supply local houses, shops and workshops. With modern plastic piping this would again be made easier and would be a much better system than permanent pipes running all over the land.

 

On the subject of water we are seeing at this time vast flooding all over England; indeed there has not been one single day without rain at some time since the end of December here in the South of England. The sad thing is that we may all moan about this but all of this water is coming down and is completely going to waste. At some time in the future Nature will right this and there will be a period of warm weather that could cause a shortage, and what has fallen in these times could have been collected and stored for later use.

 

During this period of heavy rains and storms there has been major flooding of fields where the water runs off and floods the roads, causing great problems for traffic. Where this is caused by the rivers rising it is a more complicated problem, but where it collects on the fields and runs down due to the incline of the fields there seems no reason why ditches cannot be built along the bottom of the field, with the water running into man-made ponds or reservoirs. Not only would this make the roads easier to travel on during rainy periods, but the collected water can then be used by farmers to irrigate their land when it becomes dry - thus not having to use mains water which has to be paid for. All that would be needed would be a pump to get the water out of the ponds. This is done in some foreign countries so why do we not experiment here in England?

 

The above suggestion is also valid for small Folk-Communities where rather than having the water run down drains and pipes all over the place it is carefully collected in various areas of the village or town and then reused by local houses, shops and workshops. This can be used for water for toilets and watering gardens as well as other uses that may come to mind. Rain-water would need to be collected for drinking, as well as the use of spring-water when the water-tables have stopped being lowered by taking water out in huge quantities. Springs would then not be on 'private land' but would be for the use of a local Folk-Community.

 

These changes would also put a stop to the idea of polluting the drinking water with foul-tasting chemicals and then offering bottled 'spring-water' or 'mineral water' instead - thus having the gullible people pay twice for what comes down free from the sky or upwards out of the earth - again for free. Indeed, since such vast quantities of this 'spring-water' or 'mineral-water' is supplied to places all over the world there is a hint that this may not actually come from the said springs.

 

The English Folk-Community -

 

The gradual breakdown of the multi-racial society and the violence that will be created when all of the 'communities' vie for what is left of the rubble will create a situation in which the English Folk will be forced into a migration into the rural areas of England where they will need to rebuild their ancient Folk-Communities. This would ensure a return to true English values, culture and tradition but would not mean a return to living in mud-huts in some form of primitive society. We have advanced technologically but the way that this has gone wrong has been in the use of that technology to further the aims of the Global Elite in creating a World State. If our advancement in technology were channelled into creating a better and healthier Race of Man and a more healthy society in harmony with Nature and Natural Law then there would be no need for a return to the past. What we need to do is to learn from the past, take the best from the past and use this to build a new future for the English Folk.

 

Overpopulation is a great problem but it will not be so in the future when the whole thing breaks down into disorder and chaos. Nature will right much that has gone wrong, but I am sure that the more intelligent of those who were imported into England for the purposes of cheap labour will, once their lands come under a national government, wish to get back and rebuild their lands too. Then there is a vast section of this society today that has always aided the foreign influx and done everything they can to help them settle here, building what can only be seen as a hate for their own English Kin and this Land of England. I am sure they would welcome the chance to embark upon a new humanitarian crusade to aid the same people in their lands - and would certainly not be missed here in England! Unlike the New World Order we would not need to resort to the murder of millions through wars, or the mass sterilisation of the population in order to control it. What we advocate here is far more humane than the plans put into place by the 'New World Order'.

 

Rural England is England! Where these small hamlets, villages and townships grew in size they would certainly never resemble the vast cities of today's degenerate world. If we were to look back at a city like London we would see that originally it was made up of small townships with vast open spaces in between, much of which has now been built upon. Even then most major cities of Europe were centres of culture, though here in England places like London have for centuries been the centres of the Global Bankers which left us out of the culture-creation that it could have been. Where things went wrong was the 'Industrial Revolution' which ripped thousands upon thousands of English land-workers from the land and drove them into the ever-growing cities which had become the centres of industry.

 

Where small townships grow these would become centres of culture and creativity, rather than centres of industry and banking. The size would thus be limited and would not be prone to the 'slums' and 'ghettos' that are today associated with the cities. A society based upon blood-kinship would be far more harmonious and would rid the land of racial tensions and violence. Rural areas would once more become the backbone of England and would mean a harmonious working between the Blood of the Folk and the Soil of the Folkland. Never again would mankind go against Nature and Natural Law and would be one with all life on the planet. Ecology would then no longer need to be put on an agenda because it would become a way of life - the natural thing to do.

Zero-Point Energy - The Vril Force.

With the English Awakening will come the re-connection with the Sacred Centre and thus a higher form of consciousness and intelligence. With this will come the study of the Vril-Force which is a totally free form of energy that exists rather than being created through the destruction of matter (as is fire, oil, coal, etc). The vast Oil Companies would no longer be needed and the ecological impact would be vast. This would also remove the control help by the Oil Companies and also the Arab Countries where this comes from - these people would then be free to use their own resources if they so wished to carry on doing so.

 

How could these ideas be financed -

 

If I were now to be interviewed by the BBC the person doing the interview, primed by his bosses, would certainly try to ridicule these ideas by emphasising where the money would come from. So here I am going to try to bring up ideas as to how we could afford to make such changes.

 

• The first thing to consider is that these ideas pertain to changes in energy-sources for the family, the village or the small township, and not to the vast cities of today. So the costs in the main are personal. Now, I doubt that anyone could say that in today's society there is not an enormous amount of money going to waste. With an end to mass-production and the move to quality and workmanship everything will last longer and no longer need to be renewed on a regular basis - which is money to waste. Also, in a New Order where technology would be geared to the evolution of a Higher Man, and a healthy society in which the New Man can live, there would no longer be the insane waste on computers and technological 'toys for the masses'. No more regular 'upgrades' so that a replacement is needed for ever and ever, no more 'virus's' so that they can sell us 'anti-virus software', and no more 'apps' to buy over and over again to get the next 'toy' to play with. Computers would no longer be the 'toys of the masses' but would be used only to further the cause of building a better society and a healthier Folk. There is no doubt that the technology available would make it easy to produce a computer that could be kept for a decade or really much longer, but this would not produce the profits needed to keep the consumer society going. Think how much the individual could save and thus channel into getting new energy-sources for the home.
• At a local level the Folk-Community would be responsible for ensuring that emergency energy and water supplies were available through the joint effort of all those within that community. In such a Folk-Community it would be natural to work together as a whole for the welfare of the whole; if there still existed the individual who did not work for the whole they would not benefit from the work done by others. We must always remember that here we are not dealing with this rotten society of the Old Order, but with a New Order and a New Man that will be created through a new ideology.
• There would thus be little to do in these areas at a national level, since food-production and the production of goods would go back to a local level, so financing at a national level would not be necessary. The movement of food and goods by transport would be minimalized and localised, with some national movement, and even less international movement. This would certainly make life better and healthier, and improve the air we breath.
• Even where national projects need financing this would not be much of a problem since there are many areas where cuts can certainly be made. Billions need no longer be poured into what will be the defunct 'European Union'. The 'National Debt' that has been built up over many centuries, mainly through the creation and financing of both sides in wars and through the manipulation of the monetary system to produce slumps and depressions, will be cancelled and the Global Bankers told where to go, which will free more billions for this country to use wisely. Then there is the vast amount of money handed out in 'foreign aid' which will stop immediately and be channelled to better use here in England.
• All of the money poured into a totally inefficient 'National Health Service' would be put into better use breaking away from the 'drug-system' of healing into the wiser system of creating a more healthy species of mankind that is more immune to illnesses. The shift away from treating the symptoms to finding and treating the cause will mean a good deal less wastage of money in this area.
• When the payments made to crackpots whose only input into the English society has been to create disorder and chaos, and to aid everything and everyone except the English People has been stopped this will once more free up money to use to build a new and healthy society here in England. The untold 'secret societies' that are today used to secretly promote alien ideas and doctrines into our English Society will longer be here and need paying for out of public funds. Charities for everything under the sun, many of which have been set up for the public to fund schemes that will further their own self-destruction, will no longer be needed. What people do not realise is that the 'charity' was originally set up simply because the moneyed businessman, when he gets older, has made all that he can and thus moves closer to 'God'. In doing so, with the Judaeo-Christian structure in place, his next step must be either 'heaven' or 'hell'; it is thus his aim to gain his place in 'heaven' which means he has to do something to earn it - hence the setting up of a 'charity' which not only eases his conscience for all the money he has squeezed out of others, but also ensures him a place in 'heaven'.
• Something I missed out when first doing this post - of course billions can be saved when we cease being a puppet in the Brit-Am Alliance (*) where Britain and the US continue their imperialist drive through endless wars for drugs, oil and for the resources to keep the New World Order going. We can then pull our Armed Forces out of wars that are not waged in our interest, and are waged against nations whose rulers they wish to replace by puppets of the Brit-Am Alliance. Our Loyal Troops can then be withdrawn from foreign lands and used to defend England, and where necessary to protect the Europe of Free Nations against outside aggression.
• It must also be remembered that the Global Order would no longer exist and man-power would be redirected to local and national needs within the context of a new European Imperium (not 'imperialism'). The Folk would once more be reconnected to the land - with a return to the land and the recreation of the small hamlets, villages and towns - and would thus be close to Nature and by nature would no longer seek to dominate all things and thus cause disorder and destruction of wild-life and all living things - trees being included. Plants and animals would be killed to eat and forests would be left for Nature to create rather than being 'managed' by such organisations as the 'Forestry Commission' which did its share of the damage to the woodlands of England by planting quick-growing conifers after World War I. Local borders would be based upon the landscape and not on political vote-catching, and the rivers would again be used to get about and to transport goods more efficiently - we have more advanced technology for this too. A sea-faring nation like the English should have no problem in adapting to such a change.

There are untold ways to save money and then channel it into national causes and into improving the society that we live in, but we cannot go into this here. The answer to where the money comes from is obvious really, once the wastage in this society is recognised. At a family and local level going back to a much simpler way of life, and making work into something done for the local Folk-Community rather than for someone to profit from, or to fill the coffers of the Global Bankers, will ensure that money goes into building a better and more efficient home for the family and thus a better way of life for all of the community.

 

Lastly, a return to a Heathen Society and a Heathen Folk-Community will ensure that the last vestiges of the destructive Judaeo-Christian religion, with its focus on world domination and total control, fade into oblivion as a new Natural Order arises from this destruction. When we get back to a Natural Order with a higher and more noble mankind the destruction of nature will stop for ever and man will become one with all life again - through a life-affirming religion based upon the Spirit of Nature.

 

Think National - Act Local - Not Global!

(*) The term Brit-Am Alliance is used rather than the usual 'Anglo-American' since this has nothing to do with the true English (Angles) but with the British State or British Corporation which owns and runs this country through the power of the Bankers and the Media-Press.

 

 

 

 





Animal Welfare

We live in the darkest of ages and the subject of animal welfare should be paramount in our work. The treatment of animals in this era is nothing less than atrocious and since mankind has a duty and responsibility to consider life as sacred we urgently need to address the problem of cruelty to animals. I am going to list what I consider to be the main problems and give answers as best that I can. There can be no instant solution to this problem since we do live in the darkest of ages, and mankind has lost all touch with the natural world and with fellow creatures. A new heathen religion for the English would certainly solve this problem in this country.

 

 

Battery Hens -

 

This may seem to be a much less important form of animal cruelty but nevertheless it is cruel because the hens are put in a very small cage together and they are so stressed that often the feathers are torn out which must cause pain and suffering. Here again we need to tread with caution for 'free range' eggs from supermarkets and other outlets need not necessarily be what they are since there is nothing to say that they cannot be held in larger cages and marked 'free range'.

 

The answer to this is to buy from a small local greengrocer who can verify that they are bought from a local supplier and who can verify that they are not caged hens. There are many local egg-suppliers whose premises can be seen and checked, and although caged hens eggs are cheaper (and thus bought by most people) hens that are housed in a large hen-house and allowed to roam around this lay better eggs in far better conditions. The one way to ensure that the eggs are free range is to keep hens yourself. Not everyone will wish to do this but if most people switch from battery eggs to free range eggs (bought locally and not from supermarkets) the supermarkets would be forced to stop this barbaric practice. It is unfortunate that people do have a choice but so far they have not taken the right one. If we all start to move towards non-supermarket produce (which we can do even if not totally) then we can make a difference.

 

Cruelty to pets -

 

This is perhaps the most complex subject to tackle and one that has little chance of changing under the liberal humanitarian regime that we are living under today. I think we need to understand the problem from a different angle to see why some people do treat their pets cruelly. Firstly, animals have been domesticated for thousands of years, but there is one vital difference between the ancient world and their use of animals and today's world which has one fundamental difference - in the ancient world, and up until very recent times they were 'working-animals' whereas today we see mainly 'pets'. The word 'pet' gives the clue - 'any animal that is domesticated and fondled'. The word was then developed into children being 'treated like pets' and this today is the crux of the whole problem - there are far too many people who have animals as a substitute for children, rather than their true role as working animals.

 

We need only look at the world of dogs to see what has gone wrong today, for most breeds of dogs were originally to be used as working dogs - a sheep-dog used on the sheep-farm, the German Shepherd was originally a sheep-dog but developed into a guard-dog since it has the right characteristics for this role. A husky was bred to pull a sledge on the snow, and was ideal for this purpose. Many dogs were bred especially to hunt and to aid man to get food from the wild (I shall leave out fox-hunting until later and comment upon this). What happens when such dogs are bred for 'pets'? The answer is that when these dogs cease being used as working dogs many breeds must lose their inbred characteristics, and we can see what is happening today when such breeds are bred for 'pets'.

 

Since many breeders are no longer concerned with breeding the right characteristics to obtain a specific working dog their only concern is to breed for profit and gain. This lets into play the unscrupulous element that always arises in an era like ours and many breeds of dog become unsound due to being bred for gain and profit, and the bad characteristics will then pass on to the next generation. Basically, the same happens to dogs as it has to mankind - the species degenerates and becomes worse and worse until it will finally disappear altogether.

 

Then there are the dogs bought as 'Christmas presents' for kids, despite all of the warnings that a 'Dog is for life - not just for Christmas'. At first the animal may be treated alright, until the novelty wears off and it is no longer wanted, even a hindrance to the family. Then it is abandoned to some form of 'shelter' where these animals are taken, and needs to be found a new home. This is all because a dog is bought as a 'toy' for the kids, to amuse and to keep the child occupied. This cannot be the right way to see any animal.

 

One thing that is not considered and that is the role of vets in fuelling the cruelty to animals; this may seem a strange statement but from my own experience some vets make a good deal of money from their work and can contribute to the problem even though they are not aware of this. Like doctors, vets are today little more that legalised drug-dealers, dealing out expensive drugs to their clients and making huge profits for the drug companies - rather than merely making a living. An example - some years ago I had a German Shepherd dog which was prone to the stupid habit of snapping at wasps that got near it. One day he must have done this, though I did not see him do it. The whole of his face swelled up and his eyes were almost closed, so the same evening I took him to the local vet. The vet assumed (as I did) that he had been stung by a wasp or something like that and gave him an injection - the bill was £30.00. He said to bring the dog back the next day to let him see if this had any effect. The next morning the dog's face was normal but I took him to the vet just to check. The result was yet another injection 'to make sure' - the cost £30.00. This resulted in a bill for £60.00 for a wasp sting.

 

This was not the end of the matter because the silly dog must have done the same again (like us they never learn) and his face swelled up just as before. But this time I learned by the first mistake and did nothing at all the first day; by the next morning the dog's face had gone back to normal, and the cost - nothing! Now, I do not wish to attack all vets because there are no doubt many that truly care for animals and wish to do all they can, but I do see this example (from a chain of vets in the area) as profiteering somewhat. Unfortunately some people cannot afford the fees to use a vet (which can be astronomical in the case of operations and 'pet funerals') and they allow their pets to suffer needlessly because they have no money to pay. Yes, there is pet insurance, but again this is yet another form of making money out of people - and in this case money out of nothing!

 

Another problem that is today compounding those already described is the growing trend for couples to have pets as a child-substitute. We can see this escalating when we notice the shift towards the US mentality over the 'petting' of dogs which is today yet another growing trade here in England (we always follow like sheep). All sorts of crazy things are now being done to 'pets' and mainly because the people have them as a substitute for having children. Even the most basic animal (or plant) knows that it has to reproduce itself if the species is to continue - so why then do we have so many human idiots in this nation! This process would - like many things - not be an accident but done by design in the great fever to destroy our Folk forever.

 

There is only one answer to the problem of not being able to afford to look after an animal or to pay the vet's fees and that is for people never to have pets that they cannot afford - that was my answer in the end I am afraid, though I have always loved dogs. The answer to the problem of breeding is that a drastic change in society is needed where dogs are no longer mere 'pets' but are bred for use as they were in the first place, and then bred for their characteristics rather than for profit and gain. If a dog is bred for a specific purpose there can be no valid reason why it should ever be mistreated, for to do so would be to make it useless as a working dog anyway. Of course, a change in mankind would be needed too, creating a much more responsible breed of humans that are in touch with Nature and the Natural Order.

 

A same and just society would make the worst animal cruelty cases punishable by death which would eliminate the worse type of human beings. Here lies the problem because this liberal humanitarian society cannot possibly make such laws.

 

Animal Experiments -

 

I see no reason whatever to allow any form of animal experiment that can cause stress and suffering to any animal, no matter how people see this as advancing the cause of curing illness in humans, or testing cosmetics (or anything else for that matter) on. Unfortunately the main opponents of animal experiments are the 'anarchists', many of whom are doing this for the wrong reasons - to break down all forms of authority and the hated 'state'. In doing so, with their violent tactics, they have alienated a good deal of the public who would probably have listened better to reasoned argument and healthy debate.

 

Every one of us can do some small bit to stop this, since many of these animal experiments are used for cosmetics. Steer totally clear of anything that has been developed using animal experiments. Do not buy anything that has been developed using animal experiments. In regard to the use of animals to test drugs on, or as guinea-pigs for experiments on human illness this would need a new form of leadership where this was banned - and again punishable by death should such a ban be ignored. A new heathen religious outlook would also help this process since the Judaeo-Christian religion is based upon the false assumption that everything on this planet was put there by 'God' for the use of man - this is made clear in Genesis for anyone to read.

 

Fox Hunting -

 

Here my views are perhaps going to be more controversial, since I have never come out in favour of a ban on fox-hunting. I have to state that I am not happy with the idea of the hunting of animals for sport and feel that hunting for food and clothing is a far different thing. The reason why I have not come out in favour of a ban on fox hunting is because of the 'side-effects' that were bound to happen were this imposed - as it was by a Labour Government, and probably partly  for the reason that they saw this as an 'upper-class sport' even though that is nonsense since many people of varying persuasions were involved in this area. (As I will show later there was likely a far more sinister aim behind this ban.)

 

The most obvious side-effect of such a ban has been proven right, for foxes are now becoming a pest in some areas of the urban areas since they now see man not as a predator but as something harmless to them. The effect of this will only be seen in full should these wild animals (that is what they are and not 'tame' as some people see them now) contract rabies and pass this around to other animals and humans. People who keep chickens will have seen how 'harmless' these animals can be, for they will kill chickens just for the 'sport' of it. There is also the fact that foxes will lose their predators - man - and will thus no longer be subject to being hunted which ensured that only their fittest survived. The result could be their degeneration and final demise due to the weakening of their genes - this we would not see in our time so we cannot really foresee the true results of the ban. We have seen this result in our own Folk where our gene-pool today is at an all-time low, and the degeneration is clear for any intelligent person to see.

 

There is also the question of what happens to the hounds who were bred specifically to hunt the fox, for they cannot be suddenly changed into 'pets' since this was never bred into them. I doubt if those who imposed such a ban without more careful thought would have ever considered the welfare of the hounds. Myself I feel that this was really the problem, the people who took up this crusade did so without seeing any of the future consequences, nor did they allow time for this to be fully looked into and find a solution that may have proven better for all of those concerned.

 

There is one more point that I would like to say about the issue of fox-hunting and the ban imposed by the Labour Government of the time. The heartland of the Labour party is, and always has been, the cities, and this is where their supports comes from. The ban on fox-hunting had a very much deeper meaning - it was an attack on Rural England, the heartland of the true English! This did not go unheeded since half a million rural Englishmen (including myself and other WF Activists) took part in the Countryside March which was described by one newspaper as a 'sea of Anglo-Saxon faces'. But it was far more than that too, for throughout the march were effigies of Tony Blair and his regime - this was reminiscent of the age-old 'Raising of the Stang', for this was a 'Peasant's Revolt'  of the Rural English Folk. (*)

 

Half a million English Folk took to the streets in a new form of Peasant's Revolt, people from all walks of country life too. Opposed to this massive show of strength was a small contingent of RSPCA and a handful of bongo-beating lefties. Unfortunately this massive march was not followed up by anything as strong and healthy; whether this was due to the 'Countryside Alliance' I do not know, but this seemed more of an 'Old Boy's Club' than a new revolutionary movement for the regeneration of Rural England. This march was far more than a support for fox-hunting, it was a cry from Rural England for help in the face of an onslaught that sought its total destruction. There were minor militant actions by some farmers and countrymen but this was not given the full support of the leading organisations, and had little effect.

 

(*) As heathens we must also consider that the hunt is a mimic of the Wild Hunt, for even the colours (red-white-black) are those of Eternal Germania and the Wild Hunter-God, as well as the cry 'Tally Ho' which stems from an invocation of the Wild Hunt. The hunting-horn is symbolic of the Horn of Awakening. What was once a chase after animals that could fight back - such as the boar or stag - became one whose target was the fox, which could not. There is also the old 'Prophecy of the Fox' that described the destruction of English values and the land trod by the footsteps of an invader - but it also describes the reversal of this and the final victory of the English. Perhaps this ban will have an end result that was never dreamed of by those who backed it! Indeed, maybe the Wild Hunt will now turn upon those people that set out to destroy the English Folk! Indeed, only when the hunt rides again will the English Awakening come.

 

Halal and Kosher Meat -

 

Although I do criticise the RSPCA for their support in the ban on fox-hunting, not because I back these blood-sports as such but because I feel that this ban had a more sinister side to it as I have shown, I can only commend them on their drive to ban the slaughter of animals for Kosher and Halal meat which is done by cutting the throat while the animal is conscious. The killing of animals without stunning them is absolutely barbaric, and this is done within the Jewish and Islamic communities. Here the animal has its throat cut and is bled to death, videos of which show the animals being hung upside down with their heads nearly cut off altogether, writhing in pain. Our own ancestors - the Anglo-Saxons - without the use of modern equipment, stunned the animal and rendered it unconscious before the throat was cut. There can be no excuse for the barbaric practice of not stunning the animal, and especially one hidden by the name of 'religion'. Under English Law our people are not allowed to do this so we may ask the question as to why outsiders can do so. As with many other things in this rotten society there is one law for us and another law for them.

 

The answer to this would seem to be that we do not buy any form of meat that is either Halal or Kosher; this is not quite as simple as it seems because Halal meat has been introduced into some of the supermarket meat already, and there is no doubt that it has been put in processed foodstuffs where it is harder to find. We could switch to buying locally produced meat, but again that is not quite as simple as it seems. There are many 'farm shops' who buy in from outside, even though they may state otherwise. Unfortunately it is not just the supermarkets and big business that deceive the public and there are just as many small businesses that seek to make a quick profit. Thorough checking can be the only answer until we are in a position to change the situation nationally. Again, a return to a Heathen England would stop this altogether since we would revert to our own ways of killing animals for eating, and there are far better ways today perhaps than there were a thousand years ago.

 

The transport of live animals -

 

We live in an era where Globalism (and all its inherent evils) has embraced the whole of the Earth and with it comes the problem of global trade and thus global transport. The idea of regional and local trade has not only given way to national trade but global trade, and that means the traffic of live animals abroad. Some countries do not allow this, and we should take notice of their steps to halt this because the shipping of live animals abroad has to make them stressed, and the conditions must be cruel to them.

 

The answer must be a total ban on the shipment of live animals abroad, and this can only be done by replacing the insane global society with a national society, and even then there is a need for further steps.

 

Even when a national government is put into place here in England the shipment of live animals across the country would need to be looked at carefully. When there were small localised slaughterhouses no doubt this shipment was minimal, and over short distances, but with the growing trend towards larger slaughterhouses this has to mean the shipping of live animals further and further.

 

These large slaughterhouses are yet another part of the trend towards globalism and centralisation, and the rules set by the EU have done more harm than good in this sphere. What we need is not only a return to a national government but also the revival of regionalism which would shift the emphasis back upon local trade as far as possible. Each area would become self-sufficient on whatever it produced, which would certainly mean the reduction of long-distance transport which would take place only where necessary. An end to the profit and gain type of society would need to take place.

 

 

 

 

 

House of the Wolfings - William Morris

William Morris is best known for his famous artwork, and by some as a 'socialist', though his brand of socialism was not quite so straightforward as some would have it. No doubt the Marxist Socialists claim him for their own, since he was a champion of social reform in the face of the problems created by the Industrial Revolution. Here I am going to look at a completely different side of William Morris through a study of one of his less well-known works - House of the Wolfings.

 

In the House of the Wolfings we find a tale of heroism and bravery set against the true story of Herman The Cheruscan and his victory over the three Roman Legions of Varus, whom he defeated at the Teutoburger Wald in 9 CE. Here the hero is Thiodolf ('Folk-Wolf') who is the leader of the Germanic Tribe called the Wolfings. Since there are indications that the Cheruscan Tribe were linked to the Volsungs and thus the Wolfings it is likely that Morris knew of this and worked it into his tale.

 

In this work William Morris sets out to restore the Germanic Tongue of the English through using words based on Germanic and Norse roots, cutting out as best he can the Greek and Latin words. But he does not try to revert to some archaic tongue that only a handful of scholars could understand, a futile act that that is self-defeating. Instead the words he uses can still be understood, even though many of them are no longer used in modern English - something that we would do well to ponder upon since this type of usage invokes a kind of English Consciousness through the use of archaic words spelt in a modern way.

 

'On either side, to right and left the tree-girdle reached out toward the blue distance, thick close and unsundered, save where it and the plain which it begirdled was cleft amidmost by a river....'

 

Here the words 'unsundered', 'begirdled' and 'amidmost' are not found in modern English, but they are still understandable to most people. Writing in this way, Morris evoked an air of the archaic in his works, at the same time reaching deep into the Germanic Consciousness of the English. To add to this archaic atmosphere part of the work is poetic which gives the work rhythm and rhyme, adding to the mystical appeal of a tale of honour, loyalty, strength and heroism.

 

The Wolfings are just one of the various Germanic Tribes that make up this tale, others being - the Hartings, Elkings, Bearings - whom they could marry into as close-kinship, but not within their own tribe, for they were 'not so close akin to the blood of the Wolf'. This was a law that none would break, which ensured the continuing strength of the blood of their own tribe.

 

In the great hall of the House of the Wolfings hung an Eternal Flame fastened to a tie-beam of the roof; this was named the Hall-Sun and it was tended by an appointed maiden of the Wolfing Kindred, who was also called the Hall-Sun. This maiden could not be wed to a man, since no wedded woman of that house could be a Wolfing. It is well known in genetics that interbreeding between close families can produce mutant offspring, and the Germanic Tribes well knew this and practiced a form of racial hygiene by breeding with other (Germanic) tribes around them.

 

An interesting part of the tale tells how Thiodolf is offered a magical byrnie, but refuses this because he wishes to fight the battle as any other heroic human would do, not having magical protection which the others of his kin would not have. In the end he is slain and a massive burial-mound raised over his body for future generations to see an honour.

 

The names used are taken from the Norse mainly, since William Morris was a Norse scholar, but this does not take away the feeling of the work - we all know that Swedes, Danes and Norwegians make up a good proportion of the English, indeed the royal dynasty of the Swedes was the Ynglingas, named after the god Ing - God of the English.

 

The story is worked around the age-old conflict between the degenerating power of Rome and the fight for freedom of the Germanic Folk. We see in the great German hero, Herman the Cheruscan, an elected war-lord that united warring tribes in order to save Germania from Roman occupation. Herman has as much to do with the English as he has with the Germans, since the Saxons occupied the area around the Teutoburger Wald.

 

Each Germanic Tribe had their own elected leader, but in times of war a war-duke could be elected over several tribes; Herman was such a war-duke and he united the warring tribes for the sake of the survival of them all. Unfortunately, this trait of the Germanic Tribes at the time proved to be their downfall, for after the great battle they saw no need for a war-duke over the tribes even though Herman recognised that the danger was not over. This resulted in Herman's downfall and further Roman incursions that proved more effective, though Rome never entirely conquered Germania.

 

There are sections of the tale which glaringly describe the array of war-banners of the tribes that make up the Mark, and which are waging war against the Rome-Welsh ('Welsh' meaning 'foreigner'). These banners depict animals and other symbols of each tribe - wolf, bear, elk, horse, dragon etc. Banners and flags have always been a most important part of any gathering of tribes and nations.

 

O warriors of the Wolfings, by the token of the flame,

That here in my right hand flickers, ye are back at the House of the Name,

And there yet burneth the Hall-Sun beneath the Wolfing Roof,

And the flame that the foemen quickened hath died out far aloof.

Ye gleanings of the battle, lift up your hearts on high,

For the House of the War-wise Wolfings and the Folk undoomed to die.

 

 

There is something magical about the use of this archaic tongue, something which invokes the past, past glories and honour, loyalty, heroism - all of which are missing in a stale, dying world based upon economic materialism and the greed for gold, as well as the opposing form of social order based upon the same economic materialism, on envy and greed, and all of the lower forms of human drives.

 

This tale, and others like it written by William Morris are not well known, but can be found in books in second-hand shops, though they are rare now. There is nothing of the 'Marxist Socialism' in these works, they are Germanic works designed to evoke the ancient Germanic World. This is a side of William Morris that will never be well-published, but one that ever Englishman and Englishwoman should look into for inspiration. This world was once our world, and even today the threat from Rome looms over all of the nations of Europe - in the form of the European Union founded by the 'Treaty of Rome'! Will not another Thiodolf or Herman arise in the nick of time to unite the warring peoples and once more crush the power of the 'New Rome'?