V for Vendetta

"Remember, remember the Fifth of November,

Gunpowder, treason and plot.

I see no reason

Why gunpowder treason

Should ever be forgot."

Nursery Rhyme.

The film V for Vendetta was made in 2005, some 16 years ago now; as such it has many points which connect it to our day, maybe not so much a 'prophecy' as part of the 'agenda' which is now unfolding. As with many other 'dystopian society' films that have been made over the last few decades it may well have been made in order to prepare the masses for this Global Agenda. Whatever the case, it seems to give away much information, and it also tells us how clever these people really are in what they are doing. It was based upon a 1988 DC Comics limited series, but was first introduced in 1981 or 1982 by Alan Moore, who appears (from what I can see) to have been an anarchist, and who based the series on terrorist attacks by an anarchist. The film cleverly changes this to that of a 'freedom-fighter' who uses terror-tactics to destroy the State.

What is very interesting here is that we can all see that this Global Agenda is based upon Marxism, and this through the Global Bankers and the Global Corporations, but the series and the film switches the blame to a form of Christian-Fascist State, ruled by the 'Norsefire Party'. There is no doubt that leftist writers have long been fooled by the Globalists into thinking that a Fascist State was being brought about, so this can be explained in that way, but the enfolding plot is far too near what is happening today to be a 'coincidence'. Nationalism, as portrayed in the film, is far different than Globalism, though at times it has been used to further the Global Agenda. But here two birds are killed with one stone - Fascism-Nationalism and Christianity. 

The colours Black-White-Red have been used carefully to create a clever smear-by-association.  The 'Christian Cross' has also been used in the same way, and the flags waving form yet another 'smear-by-association'. All of those involved are seen as white since this is a 'white supremacist' party. This is also firmly based upon an English State and there is no globalism in the theme. It is still clear from the many comments on such online outlets as YouTube that a 'Fascist' background is given to what is going on, though when this first started this was not so - as far as I could see, anyway. The blame is here cleverly twisted, and if these people link nationalism with fascism (they are not the same really) then they have an 'enemy' to eradicate! 

The nursery rhyme about Guy Fawkes is used in the film, but only the first few lines are driven home. This is because the rest of this is loyal to the King and Land, and Guy Fawkes is considered to have committed treason against King and Land. It was Guy Fawkes who wanted to overthrow the Crown of England, and thus has been carefully twisted into its opposite. This is a very clever ploy they use, together with the symbolism used in the film, a point brought up on more than one occasion by 'V' - the 'freedom-fighter'. 

Below I have listed some of the main ideas in the film which coincide with what is happening around the world today -

• "St Mary's Virus kills 80,000 people" a newspaper heading read, followed by the statement "no suspects so far". The clear indication is that this was a form of biological warfare, set loose deliberately. This 'virus' was not restricted to England.
• The 'Norsefire Party' were 'white supremacists' and set up 'resettlement camps', the one featured in the film being Larkhill Resettlement Camp where opponents and 'marginalised groups' (these are the 'minorities' always supported by the Leftists) were taken. These are clearly 'concentration camps', maybe perhaps a bit ironic since it was Britain that invented these in the Boer War. 
• In these 'resettlement camps' the inmates were injected with an 'artificially designed hormone injection' from which they all died slowly and painfully - except the 'freedom-fighter' - V - who became a kind of 'Superman' from being given it.
• The 'terrorist' attacks that brought the 'party' to power were the work of the 'party' itself, as were the other means, such as the 'virus' epidemic. Also, we see scenes of street-violence from protesters. 
• November 5th is used as a clear date, since this ends with the Houses of Parliament being blown up.
• The Marxist Agenda we see unfolding today has to destroy all vestiges of the past, culture, tradition and identity. This is how the film shows the 'party', a clear indication that this has been distorted, since any form of national pride involves keeping the past safe and keeping a culture, tradition and identity.
• I have shown how the Global Agenda has used certain key symbols, one of these being the 'V for Victory' used in the film Nineteen Eighty-Four and in the Victory in Europe symbolism kept alive today. Here, again, we have the 'V for Victory' sign used for the 'freedom-fighter'. 

The 'V'-sign is carefully placed inside a circle, a symbol used in the well-known anarchist-symbol, but this has an 'A' in a circle. These type of masks have been used in many leftist protests, which cannot be a coincidence. 

The other symbolism, one which I have covered on more than one occasion in the past, is the Red Rose, which is a symbol linked to the Red Dragon - the Shaitanic Dragon. The English Rose is the White Rose of Albion and is linked to the White Dragon of the English. 

We should consider the power of propaganda here, since films were once there to 'entertain' the public, but have today transformed into blatant propaganda used against the people. 'Blatant' certainly, but there are still a majority that cannot see through the lies and tricks. 'The bigger the lie, the more easier it is to believe' - this has been proven through the 'Covid-19 Cult', where clearly massive exaggerations have been deliberately made about the numbers of deaths and the numbers of cases. 

There are some points that come out of this -

• The use of the idea that is is 'For your own Protection' (a slogan used in the film) is widespread, and part of the aim to achieve total power, totally, over everything and everyone for eternity. In order to do this it is necessary for people to want to be enslaved, and to love their slavery, since for the masses comfort and ease stands above their freedom. A clear indication that the masses need to be lead, but who leads them depends upon their freedom and ability to evolve organically, or their slavery that they wish upon themselves so as to 'keep the peace' and have an 'easy life'. 
• A highly centralised and efficient force will more easily defeat a force that is scattered and fractured. The English Force was defeated by William the Bastard, and the land enslaved, because the Normans had a highly-centralised force of arms. A typical example is when the Germanic Tribes united under Arminius (Herman) to defeat the Roman Legions of Varus at the Teutoburg Wald. As a united force they were able to achieve this victory, but afterwards they splintered again into their warring tribal groups, and allowed the Romans some bit of leeway in getting into Germania. This seems to be a 'law' where something cannot be countered and destroyed by its opposite, but only by using similar tactics. The Myth of Ragnarok clearly shows us this, and it is something that needs to be considered in countering the Dark Forces.
• 'V' is the one figure that is not affected by the 'artificially designed hormone injection' in the same way as the rest; indeed, he comes out of it being stronger and more highly evolved - it transmutes him. He is also 'transmuted by fire' in the film. 
• The 'hero' of the film does not do this with the motive of a 'freedom-fighter', since his motive is one of revenge against those who abused and tortured the inmates at the Larkhill Resettlement Camp. This is why the film is about a 'vendetta'; this is not unusual since many heroic figures have achieved something beyond themselves through a personal interest rather than something done for a people. It is a personal motive and involvement that has to drive some on to great deeds. 

Another 'archetype' used in the film is that of Zorro, who is a 'freedom-fighter' who is adept at fencing and sword-play; 'V' sees this sword-play as being heroic and part of his image. Guy Fawkes was born in England, but fought for the Spanish as Guido Fawkes, thus no doubt the subtly connection made with the famous film-figure Zorro. In the films he works from an underground cave, whilst 'V' works from an underground building. This is another example where an archetypal image can be used to further its opposite meaning through a distortion of the archetype. 

There is no doubt that many have been primed over the past few decades into seeing 'fascism' as the great enemy. It is clearly portrayed as a force that takes a people's freedoms away. This has been pushed over and over again through films, books, and various other means; yet few seem to be able to see that anything 'heretic', whether in films or books, has been shut off by the book-publishers and film-makers, except for a very few published by 'alternative' means. We can see who is behind this when we move our sights from the 'virus' to 'climate change'.

Back in the spring of 2020 there appeared bus-stop signs and billboard signs with the 'Covid Propaganda' - 'Hands-Face-Space' and the other mass-slogans used to get the message to the masses. This was done through the NHS, which was clearly used as a tool by the Global Agenda. Now, over a year later, things have changed, and although we are told that the virus is worse these signs have been replaced by 'Climate Change' themes. Here it is the Global Corporations that are promoting this aspect of the Global Agenda. Even though there has been a clear 'Red & Green' movement linked arm-in-arm there are many who cannot see that we have clear proof here that behind the Reds & Greens are the Global Corporations, and behind these the Global Bankers. 

• This 'pandemic' is world-wide, but some of the fiercest oppression has been to Europe and the Europeans, except for Communist China (which has long had this anyway). This is not something 'national'.
• Almost every government in the world is now taking measures that are the same, or very similar, and reacting the same, though maybe at different times. These measures all seem to be ridiculous and insane, though the end-result is the same. (For example, who in their right mind would 'lockdown' those who were healthy; only those who have the illness would be 'quarantined'.) 
• At the same time as this 'pandemic' is going on, when some hospitals are having trouble coping, billions are being poured into 'climate change', and into the agenda based upon this, the switch from petrol & diesel cars to all-electric cars. We have come, once again, to the 'End of the World', which, if that were true (which it is not as yet), would mean that no-one would have to worry about the 'Covid Pandemic' because we would all be dead and gone anyway. Changing to electric cars, and to electric for energy would be a god-send to the Global Tyrants, since all that would be needed would be to push a switch to cut off individuals, groups or nations who oppose their aims. 

One of the main points of the agenda is to get rid of national borders and thus nationalities; we see the great movement of peoples into Europe as breaking down the barriers of identity, tradition and culture. All of which has been supported by left-wing groups who have openly encouraged this. 'People-Trafficking' is a part of this, and serves to make it a profit-making enterprise, which seems the norm with Globalists. There is a vast difference between a 'European State' and a 'Europe of the Nations', but the difference has been carefully glossed over. 

Both in this work, and in George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four we find that terrorist attacks were carefully orchestrated by the State System. It would seem logical to suppose that any form of 'terrorist attack' would be welcomed by an oppressive regime, since it would give a case for further suppression and tyrannical measures. Where such attacks are not forthcoming, from these two examples, they could be created by agents of the State System. This is how they have been able to make their 'Public Order' acts more and more oppressive, through the violence at protests, demonstrations and marches. Since this does aid them one wonders where the responsibility for such violence arose. 

This whole scene is one of Chaos, where seemingly random and chaotic forces are found working together at times, and in opposition at other times. And yet, behind this Chaos is some form of ordered agenda, where a small group or Cabal is working behind the scenes, pulling the many strings of the Global Agenda. This is very well thought out, and very clever, since so much 'information' and 'dis-information' is put out that it clouds the tree aims, and it hides those behind the whole thing. People do not know what to think! 

The last point, and that is in regard to these type of films it is the films that contain the imagery and symbolism, which would most likely not have been used in the books they were created from. Since the 'V for Vendetta' film was a series from DC Comics we can see how they have set out to indoctrinate the young at an early age. Nineteen Eighty-Four was designed for an adult read, but was written much earlier. We may notice the same tactics used with the later Star Wars Movies where the 'bad-guys' have the Black Sun as their symbol; this is viewed by adults, but the themes are really aimed at a younger audience. We have an example here of how a series has been taken and changed into something never meant by the author of the books. Another example of taking an Archetypal Myth and changing it into its opposite using careful symbolism.

Added 30th November - One point I left out of the film is that they had a memorial for the dead victims of the virus. Our illustrious royal figure, Prince Charles, has suggested that an avenue be set up as a 'memorial' to the victims of Covid-19. This is a way to keep the agenda ongoing into the future.